The CSR Newsletters are a freely-available resource generated as a dynamic complement to the textbook, Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Sustainable Value Creation.

To sign-up to receive the CSR Newsletters regularly during the fall and spring academic semesters, e-mail author David Chandler at david.chandler@ucdenver.edu.

Showing posts with label microfinance. Show all posts
Showing posts with label microfinance. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 22, 2014

Strategic CSR - Impact investing

The article in the url below outlines a productive use for the money that U.S. corporations currently have parked offshore. And, there is a lot of it. The money is offshore because the companies want to avoid paying U.S. corporation taxes on it. As such, they are waiting for the U.S. government to grant them a tax holiday to re-patriate the funds. Although this would make some sense (the U.S. government could generate some income and the U.S. economy would benefit greatly), the article suggests these companies should not hold their collective breath:
 
"… bringing home more than $2tn in profit would cost billions in corporate taxes. So companies wait, find ways to park their funds overseas and hope for an unlikely tax holiday as their 'problem' grows. Just last year, these idle overseas amounts grew 11.8%."
 
In the meantime, the article's authors have come up with an interesting use for that money that revolves around solving one of the most pressing poverty-related problems facing a sizeable chunk of the world's population (many of whom are in India and Africa)—easy access to electricity:
 
"Most Americans take turning lights on for granted. But one in five people in the world still can't plug anything in. The World Bank estimates 1.2 billion people lack electricity all together – resulting in millions of premature deaths yearly – and many more have undependable or unaffordable electricity service."
 
The authors estimate that the amount needed to solve this problem is $50bn:
 
"… solar photovoltaic cells, batteries and LED lights have grown so cheap and durable that an 'off-grid' household – spending less than it would dole out on kerosene over two years – can harvest enough electricity to power lights and charge a cellphone for decades. In Africa, for example, companies such as Azuri Technologies and M-KOPA Solar already sell 'pay-as-you-go' electrification systems for as little as $1.50 per month. At $200 each for these systems, a total of $50bn in loans – over several years – would be enough to finance the electricity to light up the world's dark homes."
 
How feasible is this? Well, the $2 trillion in corporate assets parked offshore is more than 200 times the $50bn needed to solve the problem. In fact:
 
"Some companies have enough in overseas billions – take Apple's $138bn, GE's $110bn, Microsoft's $93bn, IBM's $52bn, Cisco's $48bn and Google's $48bn ­– that just one of them could take on the whole job singlehandedly. Another lender could jump in to finance bigger systems for households or villages, or to fund renewable replacements for the sooty biomass that 2.5 billion people now use for heating and cooking (resulting in approximately 1.5 million deaths from fumes and smoke annually)."
 
Importantly, this money would be invested (rather than donated) and the transaction could be structured as:
 
"… a giant working capital fund. … Investments would be loans, and investments in promising commercial ventures, not philanthropy, and a successful program could set margins to yield competitive returns."
 
Moreover:
 
"Unlike microfinance for individuals, working capital funds would go to companies – experienced manufacturers and vendors – that would supply the systems. With this funding, these companies could grow manufacturing, education and marketing efforts, sales and collections."
 
Of course, such an investment would have multiplier economic benefits—grow companies and industries, provide jobs and local taxation, etc., etc. It is a simple idea that would have wide-ranging positive consequences for everyone. Or, as the authors put it:
 
"All this adds up to an enormous opportunity for US multinationals to make history with bold game-changing investments that will bring a billion people into the global economy – and to profit in the process. … Which company will step up to put its cash to good use, take a big bite out of fossil fuels and light up the world?"
 
Take care
David
 
David Chandler & Bill Werther
 
Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: http://www.sagepub.com/chandler3e/
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: http://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


How a single multinational corporation could light up the world
By Daniel M. Kammen and Felix Kramer
September 24, 2014
The Guardian Sustainable Business
 

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

Strategic CSR - Caring Capitalism

The article in the url below focuses on the growing wealth of successful Indian entrepreneurs (such as Vinod Khosla, “the billionaire venture capitalist and co-founder of Sun Microsystems”) and their willingness to invest it in philanthropic enterprises. One quote, in particular, from the article stood out:

“Mr. Khosla said his experience with microfinance had helped shape his views on the best way to tackle poverty. He has invested in commercial microfinance lenders and has donated to nonprofit ones, and he said that moneymaking versions had grown much faster and reached many more needy borrowers.”

The article and the philosophy behind the quote draws heavily on the Bottom-of-the-Pyramid (BOP) work of C.K. Prahalad (Issues: Profit, p271):

“By backing businesses that provide education loans or distribute solar panels in villages, he says, he wants to show that commercial entities can better help people in poverty than most nonprofit charitable organizations.”

While there is certainly an important role for social entrepreneurs in CSR (Issues: Social Entrepreneurship, p189), however, I think it is overly optimistic to think businesses should exist primarily to solve social problems.

Business is the solution to market problems/opportunities that carry social value as a consequence. Firms maximize social value by combining scarce and valuable resources to meet market needs, while considering the interests of a broad range of stakeholders and planning to maximize sustainable shareholder returns over the long term. Firms can often use their expertise to aid in meeting social goals, but this should not be their primary concern. Governments and nonprofits also play important social roles where gaps in the market occur.

The danger in using for-profit organizations primarily to solve social problems is that the profit motive can easily corrupt the founding purpose. This is becoming increasingly evident in the microfinance industry (see Strategic CSR – Microfinance, September 27, 2010, below) in which the article reports that Khosla has just profited “about $117 million” from SKS Microfinance’s recent IPO (see also, more recently, Strategic CSR – Microfinance, November 22, 2010).

Take care
David


Instructor Teaching Site: http://www.sagepub.com/strategiccsr/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: http://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


In Capitalism, Sun's Co-Founder Sees a Pathway to Help the Poor
By VIKAS BAJAJ
1287 words
6 October 2010
The New York Times
Late Edition - Final
1


From: David Chandler {msbbe096}
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 11:45 AM
Subject: Strategic CSR - Microfinance

The article in the url below suggests the dangers of success for the microfinance business model (Issues: Microfinance, p245):

“SKS Microfinance, India's largest lender to the poor, aims to raise about $350m this month by selling a 21.6 per cent stake in an initial public offering expected to spark a wave of listings by equity-strapped Indian microfinance companies.”

While the high rates of repayment and community structure present a real opportunity for microfinance institutions to be profitable (or at least self-sustaining), the profit-maximization pressures (higher interest rates and lower loan qualification standards) that accompany a public listing carry the potential to undermine the social-entrepreneurship microfinance goals (Issues: Social Entrepreneurship, p189):

“Muhammad Yunus, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning founder of Bangladesh's Grameen Bank - the world's most famous microlender - has criticised the commercialisation of the industry, saying profit-oriented microlenders are little different to the loan sharks they once set out to replace.”

The possibility for corruption quickly arises as the pursuit of profit spreads across the sub-units of the organization:

“SKS, which says it has 7m borrowers in 19 Indian States, also plans to boost its revenues through alliances with large companies to distribute their products - such as mobile phones and water purifiers - even as it provides rural consumers with the microloans needed to buy the items.”

The article in the second url below shows the success and rapid growth of microfinance organizations, such as SKS, in India:

“For the last three years, outstanding loan portfolios of Indian micro-finance institutions have grown by 65 per cent annually, according to the World Bank, with total loans of about $2.5bn to about 22.6m households.”

As well as reinforcing the threats:

“Typical loans average between $200 and $250, and carry rates of about 28 per cent - lower than money-lenders, albeit still expensive when compared with commercial bank rates.”

Take care
David


Instructor Teaching Site: http://www.sagepub.com/strategiccsr/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: http://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


SKS Microfinance plans to raise $350m in IPO
By James Fontanella-Khan in Mumbai and Amy Kazmin in New Delhi
418 words
21 July 2010
Financial Times
Asia Ed1
17

New networks help ease debt dilemma
Kazmin, Amy
603 words
21 July 2010
Financial Times
Asia Ed1
17

Monday, November 22, 2010

Strategic CSR - Microfinance

If you have been following recent developments in the Indian microfinance industry (Issues: Microfinance, p245), you will know that it appears to be falling apart as quickly as it expanded. The articles in the two urls below indicate the extent of the crisis and outline some of the reactionary legislative responses that are being put in place.

While the first article focuses on the damage being done in India:

“India's rapidly growing private microcredit industry faces imminent collapse as almost all borrowers in one of India's largest states have stopped repaying their loans, egged on by politicians who accuse the industry of earning outsize profits on the backs of the poor. The crisis has been building for weeks, but has now reached a critical stage. Indian banks, which put up about 80 percent of the money that the companies lent to poor consumers, are increasingly worried that after surviving the global financial crisis mostly unscathed, they could now face serious losses. Indian banks have about $4 billion tied up in the industry, banking officials say.”

The second article looks at the contagion effects in nearby countries:

“Bangladesh, the birthplace of the global microcredit movement, has decided to cap interest rates for microloans at 27 per cent, the latest sign of a growing regulatory backlash in south Asia against an industry once hailed as a "magic bullet" to cure poverty. The move came just days after India's microfinance industry agreed to a voluntary 24 per cent interest rate cap on its microloans in the southern state of Andhra Pradesh, where local authorities have accused the industry of charging usurious rates and employing coercive collection tactics.”

Spurred by high repayment rates and the success of organizations such as Grameen Bank (Case-studies: Grameen Bank, p246), for-profit firms quickly realized they could make money in microfinance, as well as bolster their CSR credentials, as long as they remained relatively more virtuous than the loan sharks that had previously dominated the market.

‘Relatively more virtuous than loan sharks,’ however, is not setting a very high bar. It certainly does not make a firm virtuous by any objective measure. While there are definitely higher costs involved in making smaller loans to a larger number of customers over geographically dispersed areas, it is not clear how charging up to 50% interests rates achieves the social mission of alleviating poverty (which is the driving force behind microfinance). What is happening, in reality, is relaxed standards for loan issuance on the part of firms seeking to grow and higher indebtedness on the part of already poor borrowers who are increasingly incentivized to borrow.

For-profit firms, naturally, face pressures to grow and be more profitable than not-for-profit organizations. What is vital in order for firms to retain the societal legitimacy necessary for long term survival, however, is that this growth is pursued within a sustainable business model. While having politicians encouraging loan recipients to stop making repayments is far from ideal, the Indian and Bangladesh microfinance firms that are suffering as a result have only themselves to blame.

Take care
David


Instructor Teaching Site: http://www.sagepub.com/strategiccsr/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: http://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


Microcredit Is Imperiled In India By Defaults
By LYDIA POLGREEN and VIKAS BAJAJ
1393 words
18 November 2010
The New York Times
Late Edition - Final
5

Bangladesh caps microfinance rates at 27%
By Amy Kazmin in New Delhi
485 words
10 November 2010
Financial Times

Monday, September 27, 2010

Strategic CSR - Microfinance

The article in the url below suggests the dangers of success for the microfinance business model (Issues: Microfinance, p245):

“SKS Microfinance, India's largest lender to the poor, aims to raise about $350m this month by selling a 21.6 per cent stake in an initial public offering expected to spark a wave of listings by equity-strapped Indian microfinance companies.”
While the high rates of repayment and community structure present a real opportunity for microfinance institutions to be profitable (or at least self-sustaining), the profit-maximization pressures (higher interest rates and lower loan qualification standards) that accompany a public listing carry the potential to undermine the social-entrepreneurship microfinance goals (Issues: Social Entrepreneurship, p189):

“Muhammad Yunus, the Nobel Peace Prize-winning founder of Bangladesh's Grameen Bank - the world's most famous microlender - has criticised the commercialisation of the industry, saying profit-oriented microlenders are little different to the loan sharks they once set out to replace.”
The possibility for corruption quickly arises as the pursuit of profit spreads across the sub-units of the organization:

“SKS, which says it has 7m borrowers in 19 Indian States, also plans to boost its revenues through alliances with large companies to distribute their products - such as mobile phones and water purifiers - even as it provides rural consumers with the microloans needed to buy the items.”
The article in the second url below shows the success and rapid growth of microfinance organizations, such as SKS, in India:

“For the last three years, outstanding loan portfolios of Indian micro-finance institutions have grown by 65 per cent annually, according to the World Bank, with total loans of about $2.5bn to about 22.6m households.”
As well as reinforcing the threats:

“Typical loans average between $200 and $250, and carry rates of about 28 per cent - lower than money-lenders, albeit still expensive when compared with commercial bank rates.”
Take care
David

Bill Werther & David Chandler
Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholders in a Global Environment (2e)
© Sage Publications, 2011
http://www.sagepub.com/strategiccsr2e/

Instructor Teaching Site: http://www.sagepub.com/strategiccsr/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: http://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


SKS Microfinance plans to raise $350m in IPO
By James Fontanella-Khan in Mumbai and Amy Kazmin in New Delhi
418 words
21 July 2010
Financial Times
Asia Ed1
17
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1879f6e4-9422-11df-a3fe-00144feab49a.html

New networks help ease debt dilemma
Kazmin, Amy
603 words
21 July 2010
Financial Times
Asia Ed1
17
http://presscuttings.ft.com/presscuttings/s/3/viewPdf/37730595

Monday, April 26, 2010

Strategic CSR - Microfinance

The article in the url below discusses some of the problems that have resulted from the recent explosion in growth of the microfinance industry (Issues: Loans, p188). To some degree, microfinance is becoming a victim of its own success.

In general, the microfinance industry has been altered by the influx of for-profit firms that have learnt from successful nonprofits to develop a business model that relies on the high repayment rates that are typical within the sector. With profit as a stronger focus, however, these new microfinance lenders are increasing interest rates and introducing much more liberal criteria for extending credit.

The primary focus of this article, however, is on the continued success of traditional moneylenders in India (who charge much higher interest rates), who are flourishing in spite of the success of microfinance. It turns out that the source of the high repayment rates for microfinance is also the source of the microlenders’ ongoing success:

“Some microfinance borrowers say they need village moneylenders to help them pay their debts on time. … Peer pressure to pay back microfinance loans is intense, because microlenders almost always require borrowers to join small, tightknit groups. If one member defaults, none can get another loan. Microloans have a stellar repayment rate -- close to 100% -- and some analysts believe a hidden reason is the stopgap provided by moneylenders.”

Borrowers are willing to put up with higher interest rates in order to get easier access to credit and avoid the social ramifications of failing to meet their microfinance commitments:

“… the moneylenders are virtually indistinguishable from the microlenders. They distribute knock-off versions of the microlenders' passbooks. Some use the same weekly repayment structure and door-to-door service as the microlenders do. The difference, however, is that the moneylenders give loans faster, without asking the women to form groups and serve as each other's guarantors, as microfinance lenders do in order to ensure a higher repayment rate. They also charge significantly more than the four microlenders serving the neighborhood.”

Take care
David

Bill Werther & David Chandler
Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility
© Sage Publications, 2006

Microfinance grows along with rivals --- Small credit lines were supposed to trim use of high-interest loans in India's rural areas, but moneylenders flourish
By Ketaki Gokhale
1386 words
16 December 2009
The Wall Street Journal Asia
8
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126055117322287513.html

Friday, November 7, 2008

Strategic CSR - Mobile phones

The article in the url below outlines the steps mobile phone companies are taking to develop products that appeal to consumers at the bottom-of-the-pyramid (Issues: Profit, p200):

“A study by Gartner, a technology research group, of related security issues estimated mobile phone payment systems could be available to 15 per cent of the world's 3bn unbanked people by the end of this year.”

The availability of mobile phones and the level of current technology make banking and financial services particularly amenable to the needs of BOP consumers. Often, consumers in this target market do not have bank accounts, but need to take out a loan, pay bills, or send money to friends and relatives, all of which can be done using their mobile phone:

“Mobile technology has the potential to offer cheap no-frills banking, at low risk, because transactions are monitored in real-time, on widely-used, high-quality infrastructure.”

This article came from a supplement in the FT on Sustainable Banking. Other articles in the same supplement can be found at:

http://www.ft.com/reports/sustainablebanking2008

Have a good weekend.
Dave

Bill Werther & David Chandler
Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility
© Sage Publications, 2006
http://www.sagepub.com/Werther

FT REPORT - SUSTAINABLE BANKING 2008
Mobile phone operators revolutionise cash transfers
Tieman, Ross
739 words
3 June 2008
Financial Times
Surveys SBA1
04
http://us.ft.com/ftgateway/superpage.ft?news_id=fto060220081321472830

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

Strategic CSR - Microfinance

I am not sure if the interview with Muhammad Yunus in the url link below about the launch of Grameen America (a branch of Grameen Bank, which, along with Yunus, won the 2006 Nobel Peace Price) is inspiring or depressing (Issues: Loans, p188). Inspiring because it is bringing much needed assistance to those who have the motivation to benefit from it. But, depressing because an institution that meets a vital social need in the developing world as an alternative to the loan sharks and other market predators who were the only source of credit for millions, is now deemed to be necessary in the U.S.:

“Mr. Yunus has now brought Grameen to this borough of New York City. Since taking off in January, Grameen America has lent out a total of $145,000, with interest rates at around 15% on the declining loan balance.”

The advantages for the borrowers are clear:

“Grameen cases are extremely risky," [Yunus] says. "Because not only are we poorest, [borrowers] don't have collateral, they don't have guarantees, they don't have lawyers, nothing. How risky can you get? Still, our money comes back." Grameen has claimed that over 98% of their debts are repaid.”

And the Bank’s business model is both simple and ingenious:

“Grameen, crazy as it may sound, "assumes that every borrower is honest." But it does have ways to help ensure repayment. Each borrower joins a group of people from similar social and economic conditions, and the group approves the loan request of each member. In this way, the group assumes "moral responsibility" for the loan. Mr. Yunus's use of the female pronoun is not accidental. He says Grameen Bank's borrowers are 97% women, the result of a very deliberate policy. … "we started noticing that money going to the family through women brought so much more benefit to the family than the same amount of money going to the family through men …. Let's focus on women because it changes the family faster."”

In the article, Yunus criticizes Bill Gates’ idea of “creative capitalism” and expands on his own idea of “social businesses” and makes a good point:

“Mr. Yunus freely acknowledges that the free market has done a great deal for the poor. "I didn't say that what is there is wrong. I said the structure was not complete. One piece was missing. We couldn't express within the business world all the things we want to do for others."”

Take care
Dave

Bill Werther & David Chandler
Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility
© Sage Publications, 2006
http://www.sagepub.com/Werther

The Weekend Interview with Muhammad Yunus: Subprime Lender
By Emily Parker
2134 words
1 March 2008
The Wall Street Journal
A9
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120432950873204335.html

Monday, February 25, 2008

Strategic CSR - Social Entrepreneurship

The article in the url link below reviews a new book by Muhammad Yunus (“Creating a World Without Poverty: How Social Business Can Transform Our Lives”), the 2006 winner of the Nobel Peace Prize (Issues: Loans, p188). The book is a detour from the idea that made Yunus famous, microfinance, focusing instead on:

“his other big idea: that of ''social business''.”

His idea of social entrepreneurship, or “social business” as he terms it, is described as “a new sector of the economy made up of companies run as private businesses but making no profits” and sounds a lot like Bill Gates’ “creative capitalism” (http://www.gatesfoundation.org/MediaCenter/Speeches/Co-ChairSpeeches/BillgSpeeches/BGSpeechWEF-080124.htm). Similar to Gates, Yunus envisages businesses that:

“… focus on products and services that conventional companies do not find profitable, such as healthcare, nutrition, housing and sanitation for the poor. It is predicated on the view that investors will be happy to get zero return as long as they can see returns in social benefits.”

Whereas the reviewer thinks Yunus’ idea of microfinance is effective because it involves “harnessing market forces to overcome a market failure,” he is skeptical that altruism constitutes sufficient incentive to mobilize the private sector as a whole:

“The genius of microfinance was in getting the profit motive to work for the very poorest. The drawback of social business is that it depends on the kindness of strangers.”

Take care
Dave

Bill Werther & David Chandler
Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility
© Sage Publications, 2006
http://www.sagepub.com/Werther

Poor returns.
By ALAN BEATTIE
578 words
2 February 2008
Financial Times
Surveys MAG1
Page 33
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/7c524468-cd51-11dc-9b2b-000077b07658.html