The CSR Newsletters are a freely-available resource generated as a dynamic complement to the textbook, Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Sustainable Value Creation.

To sign-up to receive the CSR Newsletters regularly during the fall and spring academic semesters, e-mail author David Chandler at david.chandler@ucdenver.edu.

Tuesday, April 1, 2025

Strategic CSR - Apologies

The article in the url below demonstrates the value of transparency in business, combined with authenticity:

"Andrew Benin wrote the email in a few hours and didn't bother proofreading or showing a draft to anyone before he sent it to 35,544 people. He was unusually eager to say the most dreaded word in business: sorry."

Specifically:

"Mr. Benin is the chief executive of Graza, a startup that has turned squeezable bottles of extra-virgin olive oil into hot kitchen staples, delighting people who never knew they could have strong feelings about healthy liquid fat. But some of those customers were disappointed when their holiday gifts arrived late and badly packaged, and Mr. Benin felt that he should apologize. To all of them. So he contacted everyone who had ordered Graza's olive oils in the previous 60 days to ask for a second chance."

There is something powerful in apologizing, voluntarily and unreservedly. It reminded me of a crisis communications seminar I sat through recently. A valued part of the event for participants was hearing from guest speakers in the industry who, let's say, are paid to make problems disappear. The lasting impression for me, though, was that the professionals do this via distraction – they are playing a game. That is, the goal is to wait out the media, make sure they do not get the information they are seeking; delay long enough until the next crisis comes along and the journalists move on to that story. Concepts such as right/wrong, fault and accountability seemed irrelevant – don't lie, but don't say anything interesting, either.

In contrast, I favor standing for something, for being 'interesting' – putting your values into action to achieve an outcome that, from your perspective, makes the situation better than it otherwise would have been. To me (and to anyone seeking to implement strategic CSR), that is the way to secure lasting, trust-based relations with key stakeholders, who will be more likely to remain loyal, in return. My sense is that Mr. Benin sees business that way, too:

"The mea culpa from a one-year-old company with the subject line 'Learning from our mistakes' was just about the opposite of a typical corporate response. It explained in plain English and candid detail what went wrong and why. It took accountability for those errors and offered a discount on future orders. It was raw, transparent about uncertainty and messy with typos and misspellings. It was also oddly entertaining and strangely charming."

The result:

"Mr. Benin watched the replies come back within minutes. First one, then another, then 866 more. 'Thanks for your honesty,' wrote one. 'I wish more businesses did the same.' 'I won't be using the discount,' wrote another, 'but I will be reordering.' 'These messages go a long way,' wrote someone else. … The average open rate of Graza's regular marketing emails was already exceptionally high at 58%. This one reached 78%."

The key takeaway for anyone looking to lead in business, in my opinion (with a note to those who would sooner rely on A.I. to bail them out – the 'average of the internet' is usually not very impressive):

"'All you need to do is dig deep, reflect on all the things in marketing and brand communication that piss you off, and do the exact opposite,' Mr. Benin said. Corporate statements about falling short and vowing to do better are so formulaic that most of these apologies could be written by ChatGPT."

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


What Happened When the Olive-Oil Startup Apologized
By Ben Cohen
January 12, 2023
The Wall Street Journal
 

Friday, March 28, 2025

Strategic CSR - Buzzwords

I am increasingly seeing headlines such as this one, which appeared recently in the article in the url below:

"Don't Call it ESG, Call it Resilience."

In particular:

"There's a new buzzword in sustainability circles when it comes to investing in renewables and clean technologies: resilience."

The pertinent term here, I think, is "buzzword," which implies exactly the right amount of thought that has gone into this latest phase of the environmental conversation. To me, it feels more like a reaction to what suddenly cannot be said (i.e., ESG) than reflecting any serious attempt to chart a measured and coordinated approach to tackling climate change:

"'In the beginning you had 'social' and 'responsible investing' and then it became 'ethical investing' and then a whole host of other things have sort of emerged from that,' said Jason Britton, chief product officer at asset manager Sphere. ''Sustainability' was a buzzword for a really long time then 'regenerative' and 'triple bottom line,'' he said. 'This is an industry's effort to describe an incredibly complex thing in a series of one or two marketing words. 'Resilience' is the bingo buzzword of the day.'"

As a result, we should expect a demise similar to all the other acronyms or "buzzwords" that have come and gone, whether CSR, SRI, ESG, sustainability, green, offsets, and so on. In my world, words matter because, when ill thought through, they reveal underlying biases and ignorance, or simply an attempt to greenwash (to borrow another fluffy phrase). The sooner we realize that trends or buzzwords are not the way to tackle a fundamental and existential threat to humanity (see Strategic CSR – Jeans), the greater the chance we will have to do something serious about it:

"For investors, 'resilience' is the new catch-all term for investments aimed at mitigating the effects of climate change on their businesses. Often seen alongside terms like 'adaptation finance' or 'transition finance,' ESG professionals are using the word increasingly in marketing and communications related to their investments."

The sentiment 'moving deck chairs around on the Titanic' comes to mind. Of course, climate change is not waiting while we decide whether we are serious.

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


Don't Call it ESG, Call it Resilience
By Yusuf Khan
February 28, 2025
The Wall Street Journal
 

Tuesday, March 25, 2025

Strategic CSR - Mining

The article in the url below makes the case for reviving mining in the U.S. for the key raw materials required to transition to a more sustainable energy industry:

"Although America has abundant deposits of many of the critical minerals that go into our vehicles, electronics and buildings, these materials are mostly mined abroad in poorer nations where labor is cheap (or worse, workers are enslaved) and environmental laws are more permissive, rarely enforced or easily sidestepped with bribes."

The argument is that, by outsourcing much of this extraction, we currently focus on poorer societies where the materials can be mined more cheaply, primarily because the standards to do so are so low:

"The decline of domestic mining means that Americans are outsourcing the environmental and social costs of our inexpensive consumer goods to lower-income nations. More than 70 percent of the world's cobalt, sometimes called the blood diamond of electric vehicle batteries, comes from the Democratic Republic of Congo, where child labor and sexual violence are rampant in mines. About half of the world's nickel, another key ingredient in electric vehicle batteries, comes from mines in Indonesia, some of which have wiped out almost 200,000 acres of rainforest amid allegations of operating illegally on Indigenous land."

So, mining domestically would introduce higher standards, by definition; it is also required so that increased supply can match growing demand:

"A United Nations study found that meeting international climate goals by 2030 could require building as many as 80 copper mines, 70 lithium mines and 70 nickel mines to supply the materials for electric vehicles, solar panels and a host of other low-carbon technologies."

And, the article advocates for a consumer-led component to the economic equation, with individual customers willing to pay the (relatively) small premium that domestic production would generate:

"Many of us are already paying more for responsibly sourced goods, such as chocolate and coffee. We should demand the same for our smartphones and batteries. … Although mining will never be zero-impact, it has the potential to be fair and responsible."

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


This Dirty Industry Is Better Off Operating in America
By Stephen Lezak
July 28, 2024
The New York Times
Late Edition – Final
SR8
 

Thursday, March 20, 2025

Strategic CSR - Time

This short video presents a dramatic, humbling, and emotional analysis of human perceptions of time (see also Strategic CSR – The Long Now). It places our lives in the context of the history of the universe (as we know it) in a way that provides insight and perspective:


The takeaway is grounding in that it challenges us to make the most of the brief moment we have been given, together with the implicit demand that we leave things better than we found them.

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, March 19, 2025

Strategic CSR - Mining

The article in the url below provides an interesting perspective on the extraction industries – especially comparing the raw materials of the past with those of the present and future:

"The mining industry is currently one of the most significant contributors to planet-warming emissions – but it's on track to become one of the most important sectors for a net-zero future."

A feature of the mining of the future is that overall demand will increase (e.g., "Annual demand for energy-transition metals will grow fivefold by mid-century from 2023 levels"), but the amount of materials extracted from the ground is predicted to decrease:

"Specifically, we'll need almost no coal – which still contributes significant revenues to mining companies. In fact, all the refined metals needed to reach net zero by 2050 will add up to less than the amount of coal mined in 2023 alone, according to think tank Energy Transitions Commission."

This graphic accompanying the article presents this contrast in stark comparison:
 

Part of the reason for this phenomenon is that the recyclable rates of the non-coal raw materials is much higher. There are other qualifiers:

"It's worth noting these figures do not include the full weight of extracted ore, which often contains a small concentration of metal. The figures also don't show the weight of extracted oil and gas. This is important because, all combined, fossil fuel taken out of the ground today still outweighs mined ores."

I have not often seen the extraction industry discussed in terms of a positive contribution to a sustainable future.

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


Net Zero Needs More Metals, But Less Extraction From The Earth
By Akshat Rathi
September 10, 2024
Bloomberg
 

Thursday, March 13, 2025

Strategic CSR - Whales

The video in the url below is a short documentary about "whale falls." This term describes the phenomenon of whale carcasses that sink to the bottom of the ocean, after the whale dies, and provide nutrition that supports ecosystems of animals that have evolved to survive in otherwise nutrient-poor parts of the deep ocean:


The video reminded me that humans are the only animal on the planet that produces any 'waste.' Every other animal only produces things that are of value to some other organism – we are the interruption of an otherwise perfectly sustainable ecosystem.

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, March 11, 2025

Strategic CSR - ESG

At a time when ESG is being attacked on all sides (the acronym, rightly so; the underlying sentiment, incorrectly), Barron's annual ranking of the "Top 100 Sustainable Companies" appeared in the article in the url below. You might be surprised at the No.1 company on the list (for the second year running):

"Clorox holds the crown for the No. 1 spot on the list for the third consecutive year. The consumer staples company, which owns household brands such as Burt's Bees, Glad, and Hidden Valley Ranch, scores high based on environmental factors, product safety and quality, and governance. While last year the company stood out for achieving gender pay equity, this year it gets kudos for linking executive compensation to how well they meet their sustainability goals."

In fact, I was quite surprised at how many manufacturing companies made the Top 10 in the table accompanying the article: 


Overall, the story was surprisingly positive:

"… while ESG critics have been cranking up the volume, the better barometer of the sustainability movement's strength comes down to a simple question: How committed are large companies to their sustainability goals? For now, most aren't backing off them, and many are making significant advancements."

As with such lists, the methodology was biased and opaque, but at least the ultimate DV seems appropriate – "operations and risk":

"The 100 companies on our list this year span market capitalizations ranging from American States Water's $2.8 billion to Nvidia's $3.4 trillion—companies that were ranked No. 73 and No. 74, respectively, on their sustainability. To evaluate all the companies, Calvert considered practices under five themes—the planet, workplace, customers, community, and shareholders—and assigned each company weightings for the categories based on what is most relevant to their business operations and risks."

It was good to see a positive narrative around a topic that has been nothing but doom-and-gloom for several months:

"The symbiosis between sustainability and efficiency at the top 100 companies often translates well for investors. In the first six years of Barron's ranking, the group outpaced the S&P 500. The 100 badly trailed the index's 25% and 26% returns including dividends in 2024 and 2023, respectively. But in those years, seven technology stocks fueled most of the S&P 500's return because the index is weighted by market capitalization."

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


Top 100 Sustainable Companies: Coping with Anti-ESG Sentiment
By Karen Hube
February 24, 2025
Barron's
Late Edition – Final
18, 20, 22
 

Thursday, March 6, 2025

Strategic CSR - Greenhushing

In contrast to the last newsletter that focused on greenwashing, the article in the url below notes that the phenomenon of greenhushing continues to spread:

"Greenhushing is the inverse of greenwashing: Companies are devoted to combating climate change yet reluctant to publicize their climate efforts. This phenomenon is emerging on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, driven by different factors."

Looking on the bright side, this does not necessarily mean corporations are pulling back from their resource and risk-related commitments, but just that they are not advertising what they are doing:

"In response to the changing political landscape, many executives in corporate America are dropping the mention of 'climate change' in meetings. Instead, they start to highlight non-climate benefits of their work, such as job creation and economic growth."

The contrast in patterns of behavior with Europe is interesting. There, corporations are also minimizing their public statements on sustainability related issues, but for a very different reason:

"In Europe, where climate change hasn't completely fallen off governments' agendas, companies are also keeping their climate actions away from public sight due to the risk of being seen as greenwashing. Overstating green claims cause reputational damage that is hard to repair."

As a result:

"In 2024, 63 out of the 100 largest publicly listed firms in the UK under-promoted their work on environmental protection, according to an analysis by market research firm Connected Impact. … When it came to US companies, the desire for staying unnoticed was even greater — as many as 67 major public and private firms resorted to greenhushing."

I have long understood that low-cost strategy companies like Walmart do not advertise to customers their progressive work on sustainability in their supply chain, but that is due to the danger of misperception around the price being charged (people believe that 'green' products are more expensive; see Strategic CSR – Greenhushing). In this case, it is a different stakeholder (the government) that seems to be driving greenhushing, with uncertain implications:

"Some worry the silence risks damaging consumers' trust and weakening peer pressure needed for motivating more companies to go green. While others say it is a wise business decision in difficult times."

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


The sound of greenhushing
By Coco Liu
March 4, 2025
Bloomberg
 

Monday, March 3, 2025

Strategic CSR - Greenwash

The articles in the two urls below offer contrasting approaches by different countries to the issue of preventing greenwash in finance. In the first article, the Swiss government (rather optimistically) is happy to trust the firms in its finance industry to self-regulate:

"Switzerland's finance sector can regulate its own members when it comes to combating the miss-selling of sustainability-themed investment products, the government said. The Federal Council had given banks, insurers and other finance firms until August to come up with an effective self-regulation framework on greenwashing."

In contrast, and employing a modicum of commonsense, the Australian government is proposing to introduce a new labeling system that will add substance to the ambiguous meaning of sustainable:

"The Australian government … will establish labels and disclosures for investment products marketed as 'sustainable,' including funds run by the superannuation industry, after a public consultation in early 2025, according to a sustainable finance framework released on Wednesday. The plan also calls for large businesses and financial firms to incorporate climate disclosures based on the Australian Accounting Standards Board's guidelines, which are due to be finalized in August."

The key to the difference is in the article headlines – while the Swiss will allow finance firms to "police themselves," the Australian government is planning to "crack down with new regulations." I wonder which approach will be the most effective in reducing the amount of misleading information and behavior that pervades all things sustainable?

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e 
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


Swiss Say Finance Firms Can Police Greenwashing Themselves
By Bastian Benrath
June 19, 2024
Bloomberg

Australia Cracks Down on ESG Claims with New Regulations
By Ishika Mookerjee
June 19, 2024
Bloomberg
 

Thursday, February 27, 2025

Strategic CSR - L.G.B.T.Q.

The article in the url below, buried deep into last week's Sunday NYT, is heartening:

"Nearly one in 10 adults in the United States identifies as L.G.B.T.Q., according to a large analysis from Gallup released Thursday — almost triple the share since Gallup began counting in 2012, and up by two-thirds since 2020."

The graph accompanying the article demonstrates the dramatic shift in reporting patterns, over a relatively short period of time:
 

It seems that the increase is accounted for mostly by "bisexual women" and younger generations:

"Nearly one-quarter of adults in Generation Z, defined by Gallup as those 18 to 27, identify as L.G.B.T.Q., according to the analysis, which included 14,000 adults across all of Gallup's telephone surveys last year. More than half of these L.G.B.T.Q. young adults identify as bisexual. Among all respondents, 1.3 percent identified as transgender, up from 0.6 percent in 2020. That is higher than other large surveys have found in recent years."

Some additional detail:
 

Presuming the percentage of the population who are L.G.B.T.Q. remains constant, the higher reporting percentage must be due to a sense of security and confidence in people feeling they can be open about who they are, which is a welcome sign of progress in our society.

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


Survey Finds Rapid Increase in U.S. Adults Identifying as L.G.B.T.Q.
By Claire Cain Miller and Francesca Paris
February 23, 2025
The New York Times
Late Edition – Final
15
 

Monday, February 24, 2025

Strategic CSR - Coal

A quick update, in the article in the url below, on where the world is in terms of its coal consumption – spoiler alert, we are not in good shape:

"We're burning more coal than ever. … Coal is both the dirtiest fossil fuel and the biggest source of electricity, accounting for 35% of the world's generation [in 2023]."

Unfortunately (or fortunately, depending on how you look at it), this sorry state represents progress:

"From 2006 through 2014, [worldwide coal consumption] was 40%-plus."

And, it does not look like we can keep the positive trajectory going:

"But even as scientists sound the alarm on dangerous climate tipping points, coal consumption is still growing. It's expected to hit a record in 2024, and is on track to be higher in 2050 than it was in 2000."

As an indication of how far from where we need to be we currently are:

"To reach net zero by 2050, global coal use would need to fall by more than 90%, and what's left would need to be handled by plants capable of capturing and storing emissions."

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


Why We're Burning More Climate-Warning Coal Than Ever
By Will Wade
August 12, 2024
Bloomberg Law
 

Thursday, February 20, 2025

Strategic CSR - Larry Fink

This graphic produced by Bloomberg from the article in the url below is both interesting and frustrating:


It is interesting and frustrating for the same reason – because it reveals a superficial commitment to something that needs to be sustained and genuine. Fink had built a reputation for himself as someone who is committed to the sustainability cause. The chart reveals a superficiality to that commitment. I am all in favor of revealing the lack of thought that is invested in the latest term or acronym that gets the mainstream CSR conversation excited, but this very much suggests Fink is a victim of that superficiality, rather than having thought through what he was saying, and/or his and his company's ability to implement:

"[Larry Finnk's] 2020 letter mentions terms like climate, ESG and sustainability 46 times. But executives changed their tune after Texas and other US states launched attacks and legal action on the investment management company. 'Larry Fink used to talk quite a bit (in fairly short letters) about climate, sustainability, and ESG. … Now he does not.'"

Either way, it is another step backwards, when we need to be moving forward.

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


Wild Cards for the Green Transition
By Aaron Clark
February 3, 2025
Bloomberg
 

Tuesday, February 18, 2025

Strategic CSR - Personhood

Following its groundbreaking law that granted legal rights to a river (see Strategic CSR – Personhood), New Zealand has taken another step forward in its recognition of the importance of the natural environment to its culture and heritage:

"A settlement under which a New Zealand mountain has been granted the same legal right as a person has become law after years of negotiations."

Specifically:

"It means Taranaki Maunga [Mt Taranaki] will effectively own itself, with representatives of the local tribes, iwi, and government working together to manage it. The agreement aims to compensate Māori from the Taranaki region for injustices done to them during colonisation – including widespread land confiscation."

While I appreciate the symbolic value of this decision, in terms of respecting the Maori culture, tradition, and perspective on the natural environment ("natural features, including mountains, are ancestors and living beings"), it is challenging to see the practical implications. What does it mean for a mountain to "own itself"? The value of treating corporations as legal persons is that they can own assets and be sued in a court of law. This underpins the law of contracts and property rights, which are fundamental to our economic system. Firms also form the apex of the stakeholder structure, so create value for others, rather than needing value to be created for them:

"[Government Minister] Paul Goldsmith acknowledged that … it had been agreed that access to the mountain would not change and that 'all New Zealanders will be able to continue to visit and enjoy this most magnificent place for generations to come.'"

In this case, the name of the mountain will be changed, which his meaning, but it is difficult to know how this fits into the strategic CSR perspective, given that the mountain cannot communicate discernable interests that can be met. Rather, anyone seeking to interact with the mountain will need to deal with the appointed human 'representatives' of the mountain (who no doubt have their own values and interests):

"It means Taranaki Maunga [Mt Taranaki] will effectively own itself, with representatives of the local tribes, iwi, and government working together to manage it."

Given that the mountain cannot communicate its interests to those representatives (as far as we know), we will have to rely on the genuine intent with which they interpret what is best for the mountain:

"The mountain is not the first of New Zealand's natural feature's to be granted legal personhood. In 2014, the Urewera native forest became the first to gain such status, followed by the Whanganui River in 2017."

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


New Zealand mountain gets same legal rights as a person
By Kathryn Armstrong
January 30, 2025
BBC News
 

Thursday, February 13, 2025

Strategic CSR - Cotton + water

I knew that the production of cotton took vast amounts of water, but only a vague sense of how much. The article in the url below quantifies this amount in a very relatable way:

"For all the water you'll ever use to wash your cotton T-shirt over its entire lifetime, it will have taken 50 times as much water to grow the cotton that went into it."

In addition to the water used to grow cotton, large amounts of insecticides and pesticides are used; there are also challenges related to the harvesting and processing of this crop:

"Cotton uses about 2.3% of global arable land and accounts for 16% for all insecticide sales. And the fashion industry has been forced to reckon with allegations of forced labor and poor working conditions in certain cotton-harvesting regions."

The article proceeds to detail a "Boston-based startup Galy" that is developing a more sustainable alternative, which (if it can be commercialized and scaled – always huge barriers) addresses many of these challenging issues, for which the fashion/apparel industry is only now beginning to be held accountable (see Strategic CSR – Fast fashion), or perhaps not (see Strategic CSR – Shein + Boohoo):

"Galy takes cells from a cotton plant, adds them to a large vat and feeds them sugar. After they have sufficiently multiplied, Galy technicians use their genetic understanding of the plant — which has been developed over decades of research — to activate certain genes and deactivate others. The result is the cell transforms and elongates into a cotton fiber. So far, Galy has only been able to make a few kilograms of vat-grown cotton. If it can make more at scale, the company has big dreams to also make lab-grown cocoa and coffee powders."

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


Fast Fashion Bets on Greener Lab-Grown Cotton
By Akshat Rathi
September 3, 2024
Bloomberg
 

Tuesday, February 11, 2025

Strategic CSR - Coal

Here is a tale of two trajectories for coal that are heading in opposite directions (at least, in the short term). First, the article in the first url below reports that Duke Energy has announced its intention to change its plans for its largest coal-fired power plant. The company had originally planned to close all its power plants that use "the dirty fuel" by 2035, but that has now changed:

"The utility said it plans to operate its massive Gibson Station in Indiana through 2038, according to a presentation about its resource plan for that state posted on its website Thursday. The company previously said it would shutter the plant by 2035, in line with its broader plan to be entirely coal-free by that year."

What is interesting is that the article (pre-DeepSeek) blames A.I. for unpredicted electricity consumption, which is causing utilities to alter their plans of how they will be able to meet that growing demand:

"Some US utilities are struggling to meet ambitious climate goals set before electricity forecasts began spiking amid tech giants' move to build new data centers for artificial intelligence."

Similarly:

"FirstEnergy Corp. announced earlier this year it was abandoning its 2030 target for slashing greenhouse gas emissions because it couldn't replace some coal plants in time."

In contrast, the article in the second url below reports that the UK closed its last coal-fired power plant, in early October last year, in what is being framed as a risky experiment to meet its previously announced GHG emissions goal:

"By closing the 2,000 megawatt (MW) coal plant in Nottinghamshire, Britain has become the first G7 country to end coal-fired power production and make significant progress against energy transition and pollution reduction targets."

The key is that the UK is not self-sufficient in terms of LNG, which means it will need to rely on imports, paying the market rate that is heavily influenced by geopolitics:

"UK gas consumption has exceeded domestic gas production for the past 20 years, according to the 2024 Energy Institute Statistical Review of World Energy. … Between 2018 and 2023, UK LNG imports jumped by 171% from 7.2 billion cubic meters (BCM) to 19.4 BCM, according to the Energy Institute."

Take care
David

David Chandler
© Sage Publications, 2023

Instructor Teaching and Student Study Site: https://study.sagepub.com/chandler6e  
Strategic CSR Simulation: http://www.strategiccsrsim.com/
The library of CSR Newsletters are archived at: https://strategiccsr-sage.blogspot.com/


How is the energy transition going?
By Brian Kahn
October 4, 2024
Bloomberg Green

UK's last coal plant shutdown bodes well for US LNG export
By Gavin Maguire
October 1, 2024
Reuters